Skip to main content
[email protected] 24/7 Support
Menu

Barcode scan across three different apps

posted by obt92 4 months ago 546 views 5 comments

Tested my prop with IDVisor, BarZapp, and a generic PDF417 reader. All three read without errors. Data on the barcode matches the front of the card. This is the baseline test everyone should run before using.

17
Cheesehead •

Yeah, totally agree about IDVisor being the main benchmark. I’ve had props that pass scan fine but still fail because of lazy holograms or issues with the ghost image — those detail flaws pop under 365nm UV light. Getting the surface features right alongside a working PDF417 scanner pass is priority one in my book.

0
0
cbomm •

This should be the standard test protocol. Good writeup.

6
6
750iqkid •

BarZapp catches things IDVisor misses. Smart to test both.

4
4
ketokk •

Front-to-barcode data consistency is the thing that catches a lot of low quality props.

3
3
yungniggaa • • Edited 4 months ago

Yeah, IDVisor is definitely the one that matters. I've been running tests across a bunch of apps—Bouncer, Scannr, IDCheck, the usual suspects—and IDVisor is by far the most common scanner that real venues, clubs, and bars actually pull out. If you can pass that, you're good at probably 90% of locations, no question. But passing IDVisor isn't just about having a clean barcode scan—the scanner's really checking a combo of security features, so you need the whole card to be on point.

So here's what IDVisor picks up. First, the hologram overlay. A legit overlay has a very specific construction—it's not just a sticker. It's a clear laminate with embedded micro-text and a holographic pattern that shifts smoothly when you tilt the card. On a good fake, the overlay should have that same layered feel, with the hologram seamlessly integrated into the card surface rather than sitting on top like a cheap appliqué. IDVisor's camera zooms in on that overlay and looks for the correct diffraction grating and the precise spacing of the holographic grooves. If the overlay is too thick or the hologram doesn't shift naturally, it'll flag it.

Ghost image clarity is another big one. Most state IDs have a ghost image—a faded, offset version of your photo usually on the right side. Under IDVisor, that ghost needs to have the right opacity level, not too dark and not too faint. It also has to line up correctly with the main photo. I've seen fakes where the ghost is just printed at a lower opacity, but the scanner can tell when it's part of the same print layer vs. a separate exposure. The edges of the ghost image should be crisp, with no pixelation or blurring that'd suggest a home printer job.

Perforation pattern quality matters a ton. Many states have a micro-perforated birth date or a state seal that's actually punched through the card stock. On a real ID, those holes are perfectly round, evenly spaced, and the edges are clean because they're die-cut. Under IDVisor's high-res sensor, any irregularities—like ragged edges, inconsistent hole sizes, or melt marks from a laser—stand out immediately. A passable fake has to have those perforations drilled with precision, not just burned or scratched in.

UV detail accuracy is where a lot of fakes fail. IDVisor doesn't only use white light; it'll toggle a UV light source to check for hidden state seals, state outlines, or repeating patterns that only show under UV. The UV ink has to be the exact shade (usually a bright blue-green or orange-yellow) and the pattern has to match the state's specifications exactly. And even the positioning of the UV elements is critical. Like, I've seen good holograms and great perforations, but the UV was slightly off-shade or the pattern was misaligned by a millimeter, and IDVisor caught it every time.

Speaking of my own scanner test results, I've run my current card through IDVisor on three different phones (iPhone 14, Samsung S23, and a Pixel 7) and it passed on all three across those three apps that usually pop up: IDVisor itself, Scannr, and Bouncer. But here's the key—IDVisor is the most stringent. Scannr might give you a green check even if the UV is a little weak, but IDVisor will throw a yellow warning. If you get a green check on IDVisor, you're solid. The barcode scan passes because the 2D barcode (PDF417 or Aztec) encodes all the data correctly—name, DOB, address, expiry—and the scanner verifies that the data matches the printed text on the front. But honestly, that's just the start—the real test is all those physical security features I just mentioned. So yeah, focus on your overlay, ghost image, perforations, and UV, and you'll be set for that 90%.

0
0

Please login to comment on this thread.