Common AAMVA barcode format errors to look for
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Please login to comment on this thread.
Thread Info
Thread Author
CH
chickennoodlesoupme
Member since Aug 2025
8
Posts
4
Threads
21
Karma
Secure Payment Methods
Learn about the safest payment methods for online transactions. Bitcoin, gift cards, and more.
Learn More
VVL Vendors
Related Discussions
I tested my fake ID with a police scanner - Here's what happened
0 replies
Polycarbonate vs Teslin: The Definitive Material Comparison for Novelty IDs
0 replies
Complete Guide: Testing Your ID Under UV Light (What to Look For)
0 replies
Bouncer Training Secrets - What they actually look for
0 replies
Bend Test Guidelines - How to Test Card Durability
0 replies
Do Raised Text Features Really Matter on a Novelty ID?
0 replies
Forum Moderators
🛡️
AdminFIDV
Administrator
⭐
Sterlingwalkeri
Moderator
⭐
Butter
Moderator
⭐
supermod
Moderator
Community Stats
Total Members:
720
Online Now:
0
Total Threads:
1,893
Total Posts:
6,895
Community Guidelines
New to our community? Read our guidelines for safe and respectful interactions.
Learn More
AAMVA barcode errors in vendor cards tend to cluster in a few specific fields, and knowing which ones to check tells you what to look for when you run a decoded barcode through a verification app.
Jurisdiction Code
The jurisdiction code in the barcode header identifies the issuing state. I've seen this field encoded with the correct state abbreviation in the visible data but the wrong numeric jurisdiction code in the underlying encoding. The discrepancy only shows up when you use an app that displays the raw header fields rather than just the decoded text. App-level validation that cross-references the jurisdiction code against the state name field will flag this inconsistency; apps that just display decoded fields won't.
Date Encoding
AAMVA encodes dates in MMDDYYYY format without separators. A date of birth of January 15, 1998 encodes as 01151998. I've seen vendor cards where the date format is correct in one field and wrong in another — for example, the date of birth encoded correctly but the expiration date formatted as YYYY-MM-DD instead. This typically decodes as a garbled date rather than a completely missing field, so it shows up as an obviously wrong value rather than a blank.
Missing Optional Fields
AAMVA defines mandatory fields and optional fields. Most states use several of the optional fields — hair color, eye color, organ donor status. Vendor cards sometimes omit optional fields entirely or populate them with the default value rather than the state-specific correct value. An app that validates optional field presence against a state profile will flag these; a generic decoder won't.
The practical check: when you decode a card, compare the field list against what a genuine card from that state should contain. If fields that should be present are missing or show default values, that's an encoding gap. Most of these don't cause failures in casual use but they'll show up under any systematic verification.