Skip to main content
[email protected] 24/7 Support
Menu

Do scanners flag duplicate magstripe data across states?

posted by BossMan2333 10 months ago 1,001 views 4 comments
Was talking to a bouncer friend and he said their scanner logs magstripe data. If two IDs have identical track info it flags them. Anyone know if vendors reuse magstripe templates across different states or batches? Using a Nevada and a buddy has a Washington from same vendor.
0
nickiminaj •
Tell your friend the scanner flags repeated swipes at the same venue more than duplicate data across venues. You should be fine.
0
0
BossMan2333 •
Good to hear. I was worried a reused track would get us both flagged.
0
0
barluver69 •
I compared my NV and my friend’s TX from same shop—tracks were different. Only older runs reused the same data.
0
0
SmurphBoy • • Edited 4 months ago

Yeah, the duplication concern across different states is pretty much a non-issue these days. Most of the better vendors have been randomizing track 1 and track 2 per order for a while now. So even if you swipe the same ID at two different locations, the magstripe data itself won’t be identical—each order gets its own unique set of encoded data. And honestly, that kills the whole “flagged for duplicate swipe” problem before it even starts.

Big chain stores like Walmart, Target, or most grocery chains don’t share a centralized database across state lines. Their POS systems store swipe history locally at the store level or maybe within a regional server, but they’re not cross-referencing your swipe data with a store in another state. So even if you had two identical tracks (which you won’t), the flag wouldn’t trigger. They’re looking for return fraud or chargeback patterns within their own system—not nationwide ID matching.

That said, magstripe randomization is just one piece of the puzzle. The physical security features on the ID itself still matter a ton. Take hologram overlay construction, for example—if the vendor isn’t layering the hologram correctly with proper microtext and shifting images, the whole card just looks off under light. As for the ghost image, clarity really comes down to print resolution and the lamination process. A muddy ghost image is an instant tell, no matter how good the magstripe data is.

Perforation pattern quality is another thing that can vary a lot. Real IDs have clean, uniform micro-perfs that don’t look like punched holes. UV detail accuracy is pretty critical too—if the UV overlay doesn’t match the state’s specific design (like state seal placement or secondary patterns), it’ll fail under a blacklight in higher-security environments like airports or casinos. I’ve seen otherwise solid IDs get burned just because the UV was off or too dim.

And on the scanner test side, even with randomized tracks, you’ll still want to make sure the encoding matches the visual data. If your name or DOB on the magstripe doesn’t line up with what’s printed, that’s a red flag. Some scanners also check the parity bits and LRC, so if the randomization is done sloppily, it might fail. Most vendors have figured this out by now, but it’s worth testing on a few different readers before using in the field.

Bottom line—cross-state duplicate magstripe flagging isn’t really a thing, but you still need the whole package to hold up. Physical features like holograms, ghost images, perforations, and UV need to be on point too, or the magstripe being randomized won’t save you from a sharp-eyed clerk or bouncer.

0
0

Please login to comment on this thread.