Skip to main content
[email protected] 24/7 Support
Menu

Understanding tactile print and laser engraving depth d...

posted by Lneb 2 months ago 390 views 0 comments

Tactile elements on identity documents are harder to evaluate than optical features because there's less reference material available and the feel is difficult to communicate in writing. I'm going to try to be specific about what I've found through physical comparison.

Tactile features on genuine cards are typically produced through one of two methods: laser engraving directly into the card substrate, or embossing during the lamination process. Laser engraving creates features that are recessed into the card surface — you feel a small indentation when you run a fingertip across the feature. The edges of laser-engraved features are sharp and clean. Embossed features are raised slightly above the card surface and have a softer edge profile.

On genuine polycarbonate licenses, the laser-engraved elements are part of the card material itself rather than applied to the surface. Running a fingernail lightly across the feature feels like running it across a surface with a slight groove — the nail catches slightly but doesn't catch on an edge or layer boundary. The tactile depth is subtle: typically less than 0.1mm. It's the kind of thing you feel clearly when you're looking for it but might miss if you weren't paying attention.

On novelty cards, the tactile simulation varies considerably. Better vendors create features with laser engraving that produces a genuine indentation, though the depth and sharpness are usually less precise than a genuine card. Lower-quality approaches include printed features with no actual depth, or features created by applying a textured material to the card surface rather than modifying the substrate itself. Surface-applied features can be detected by running a fingernail at a shallow angle — they catch differently than a recessed feature, and you can sometimes feel the edge of the applied material.

To calibrate your sense of what a genuine tactile feature feels like, handling a genuine card for comparison is the most reliable method. Any secondhand description, including this one, is a poor substitute for direct tactile experience with a reference card.

29

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Please login to comment on this thread.