Home › Reviews › EvolvedIDs

EvolvedIDs Review

Detailed review by waltjenx

8.4

Overall Rating

out of 10
W
waltjenx

Reviewed on August 18, 2025

Minnesota

General Review

Ordered from Corrupt a while ago but had some issues with the address/shipping, ordered most recently 19 January, he said it shipped out the weekend of 23 February, but the package ship date is 20 March and I received today. Not sure why he would ship it a month later than when he said, but shipping was quick.
Detailed Ratings
Communication
8.0/10
Sometimes answers, sometimes doesn't, sometimes takes a while to reply
Cost/Value
10.0/10
Pretty good, especially considering there he's one of the only ones to produce MN IDs
Shipping
4.0/10
Had some issues previously with the address, this is the third shipment and it finally arrived. Probably not the norm tho, not sure what his turnaround time actually is
Template Quality
9.0/10
Very bendy. Comparing to Bar Book, everything looks pretty much spot on, the yellow sun seems like it could be a bit smaller, i.e. not covering the M and starting between the I and the N. The 'Minnesota' cursive text should also probably not extend as far to the right, but minor details. Not sure if ZIP is supposed to be 5 or 9 digits as I've seen both. Signature could be more centered. DL # correctly formatted, with sum of first 3 digits = sum of last 3 digits.
Photoshop Quality
9.0/10
The Photoshop is decent, ear shadows are present. Not sure if the distortion of the picture is normal/intentional. Also not sure how the quality is supposed to be, the picture on the ID seems to be bit too good quality, but maybe MN just uses nice cameras
Holo/OVI
7.0/10
Real MN has no holograms, besides for the loons, but he did mention these IDs would not have the loons – I don't really know what that is anyways/how many bouncers out of state would know about them, also considering how few people have MN fakes
UV Features
10.0/10
Picture: [URL] It's there, shows up decently well
Scanning
9.0/10
Shows up as valid on BCS, but scanning on both BCS and pdf417, address isn't present at all (empty) and expiration date is 01-01-2099. Not great.
Signature
9.0/10
Good, seems to be the right size, but probably could be centered more instead of to the side.
Conclusion
9.0/10
Overall pretty good, had some problems but in the end it came thru, scanning could be an issue tho as the address does not show up at all, and the expiration date shows as 01-01-2099. Otherwise, out of state, you're probably good, especially seeing how few MN fakes there are, unless the bouncer thinks it's 'too flimsy' or 'doesn't have holo' or whatever. In state, the ID doesn't have loons, so may be a giveaway.
Review Photos (1)
Review image
Vendor Information
EvolvedIDs
Category trusted
State Minnesota
Average Rating 8.8/10
Total Reviews 562
Uncertainty Factor: Medium
View Vendor Details
Review Stats
Review Date Aug 18, 2025
Overall Score 8.4/10
Photos Included 1
Back to All Reviews Browse Vendors