Skip to main content
[email protected] 24/7 Support
Menu

California vs Texas - which passes better?

posted by ThatMainStreamGuy 10 months ago 1,029 views 4 comments
Been debating between getting a CA or TX ID. I live in the midwest so either would be out of state. Which one has better success rates at strict venues? I've heard CA is harder to fake well but TX gets more scrutiny because it's popular. What are your experiences? Looking for something that works at clubs and high-end bars.
7
not_tame_impala • • ✓ Best Answer
For midwest use, I'd actually suggest neither. Get a nearby state like Illinois or Michigan. Out of state IDs always get more scrutiny. A good in-region fake beats a perfect CA any day.
6
6
Dickie • • Edited 4 months ago

Texas all the way, hands down. I've been around the block on both of these and honestly the new TX template is just a home run right now. Most vendors have really dialed in the replication—the card stock feels almost spot-on to my hand, that slightly flexible but sturdy polycarbonate blend they use on the real deal. Microprint on the new TX is crisp too — I checked it under a loupe and the tiny state name in the background doesn't smear or blur like some older attempts. UV response is solid: bright, consistent blue with the right intensity, not too washed out and not blinding. The OVI on the lone star and the state outline shifts from copper to green nicely, maybe just a touch slower than real but for general use it passes the tilt test every time.

California though, man, what a headache. They packed so many security features into that card that replicating it cleanly is a nightmare. The raised lettering on the date of birth and the top line — that's the killer. Most vendors end up with it either too flat, too shiny, or uneven. I've seen some attempts where the lettering feels more like a thick sticker than actual embossing. The microprint on CA is tiny and multi-line in the background, and a lot of replicas I've handled have gaps or broken letters under magnification. UV response is decent when they get it right — the state outline and bear glow a soft green — but I've seen batches where it's way too yellow or barely visible. OVI on the CA bear is color-shifting yellow to green, but the transition is often muddy. And the card material? Hard to nail the exact feel of the thick polycarbonate with those smooth edges; too often I've gotten cards that are flimsy or have a tacky finish.

So yeah, if you're picking between the two for regular use, go Texas. The newer templates are just more forgiving and the replication's been refined pretty well by now. I'd give the best TX fakes out there a solid 8.5 to 9 out of 10 overall — everything from the raised text on the top line to the feel in the wallet just works. California, even from the top-tier guys, I'm looking at maybe a 6 or 6.5 out of 10 at best. The raised lettering alone drags it down, and the microprint accuracy is a constant gamble. For what it's worth, if you really need a CA, you have to hunt around and pay a premium, but Texas is the safe bet every time.

4
4
Guwop_1 •
Disagree - if you get CA from a top vendor it's solid. The key is the feel of the card and the OVI. But yeah budget CA fakes are terrible. You get what you pay for.
3
3
needabitch •
This is good advice. I used a TX in Chicago and got questioned every time about why I was there. Switched to Wisconsin and zero issues since.
2
2

Please login to comment on this thread.