Skip to main content
[email protected] 24/7 Support
Menu

Colorado mountain hologram - advice needed

posted by kh1214 7 months ago 793 views 4 comments

Does the CO hologram look right? The mountain detail seems tricky to replicate

3
marg3 •

Useful info, thanks for posting

4
4
mdog • • Edited 4 months ago

I recently got my hands on a Colorado copy and I've gotta say, the mountain hologram is the best I've seen. Like, really accurate. The main reason I'm posting this is because I know a lot of people struggle getting that Colorado mountain scene right—the state outline, the peak silhouettes, the little stars—but this one nails it. The hologram itself has a really clean, crisp look. The mountain range is properly shaped with that distinctive front range curve, and the detail inside the peaks is surprisingly sharp. No blurring or weird fuzziness around the edges like some of the older versions I've come across.

So here's a breakdown of what to look for. **Microprint accuracy** – this is where a lot of fakes fall apart, but not here. Inside the hologram, there's microtext running along the mountain bases and within the state outline. I checked it with a loupe and it's perfectly readable, no smudging or broken letters. The tiny "COLORADO" text that's supposed to be hidden in the lower ridge is there and crisp. Honestly, it's the cleanest microprint I've seen on a Colorado hologram in a while.

**UV light response** – I hit it with a 365nm light. The holigram lights up with a bright, even golden-yellow glow across the whole mountain scene. The color is dead on to the real deal – not too pale, not too neon. Brightness is consistent from edge to edge, no dark spots. There's also a secondary UV element on the front that shows the state outline and "COLORADO" in a lighter yellow, which is pretty standard for the real IDs. That part is well done too, though I'd say the brightness could be just a touch stronger in one corner – still passes every casual check though.

**OVI color-shifting quality** – the Colorado card uses OVI on the state outline and sometimes on the mountain hologram itself. On this copy, the color shift goes from deep green to rich gold when tilted. The shift is smooth and the transition happens at the right angles. No weird rainbow splashes or flickering like you'll sometimes see on cheaper attempts. The metallic effect is also present in the mountain details – when you tilt it, the peaks catch the light and shift slightly, which adds a lot to the realism.

**Card material feel** – the whole card has that same Teslin-like flexibility as a real Colorado. It bends without creasing, and it has that slight tackiness you get from the polycarbonate layers. The thickness is spot-on – not too thick like some other states can be, not too flimsy. The laminate has a nice matte finish that matches the real card's surface. I compared it side-by-side with a friend's real ID and the texture is nearly identical. Even the raised text on the front (date of birth etc.) feels right – not too sharp, not too flat.

Overall, I'd give this Colorado copy a solid **9/10**. The mountain hologram is definitely the star of the show – it's easily the most accurate I've seen in terms of shape, microprint, and color. The UV could be a tiny bit brighter in one corner, and the OVI shift is maybe 95% there, but nothing that would fail a decent bouncer test. If you're looking for a Colorado option, make sure the hologram looks this clean. Anyone else had luck with a different batch? Always looking for feedback on the subtle details.

3
3
sotagal •

Useful info, thanks for posting

2
2
JDiFet •

Its pretty good. Under normal lighting you cant tell

0
0

Please login to comment on this thread.